Hi !!
fair enough; i'm going to define the whole product as
SPF+SES+SRS+DK and work to get that into MTAs and distributions.
why still SRS ? why not SPF+SES+DK ? In any case DK could be
implemented without the need and without any interaction with
the rest. SRS is only need to solve SPF problems and SES solve
those problems, solves another problems and could be deployed
without breaking anything and apart from SPF, but SES will work
better when published in spf records and understood by spf
implementations. Maybe the way to go is to convince spf
developers to support ses modifiers.
--
Best regards ...
It's a fine line between fishing & standing still
----------------------------------------------------------------
David Saez Padros http://www.ols.es
On-Line Services 2000 S.L. e-mail david(_at_)ols(_dot_)es
Pintor Vayreda 1 telf +34 902 50 29 75
08184 Palau-Solita i Plegamans movil +34 670 35 27 53
----------------------------------------------------------------