spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

include: enhancement suggestion

2004-11-12 09:35:49
The following was included in a reply to the "Odd Problem" thread, but I wanted to get some direct feedback to my thought as expanded here.

Does it make any sense at all (or would it be appropriate) to have an additional parameter associated with an "include:" to force MX compliance at the included domain only if no SPF is published at the included domain (e.g., perhaps something like "include:DNS77.COM include-:MX")?

Where the include-: could have all appropriate standard SPF syntax to follow (e.g. IP4:, A, MX, etc).

In this way, a domain owner could be explicit about what gets sent and received via a non-SPF publishing third party "include:" domain. For example, if I was a LARGEISP.NET user and wanted to send mail from my domain, but through LARGEISP.NET's MTA, if I created a record with include:LARGEISP.NET and include-: MX, that might mean it was acceptable for me to send mail from my domain name, through LARGEISP.NET but only via LARGEISP.NET's MX servers.

I realize that one is essentially publishing an SPF record for another domain in doing this, but it does allow the publishing domain name owner to be more explicit in their desires if the include domain itself does not publish SPF records. Perhaps a proposed "include-:" could actually use the "all" syntax for its characters to be more clear with intent - in other words, "include+:", "include-:", "include?:", etc.

Arguably, this could end up living longer for situations where an ISP might not be willing or able to publish SPF records for other domains their users might have, but might be willing to allow FROM domain through their SMTP server for domains that publish SPF records indicating this is an acceptable choice by the domain owner.

Perhaps another parameter might exist to let an ISP who does publish SPF to allow or not allow that choice (e.g. a noinclude(+)(-)(?): parameter to indicate that this behavior is not acceptable) for domain owners who might wish such a domain owner syntax to live on past when the ISP publishes an SPF record.

Best,

Alan Maitland
The Commerce Company - Making Commerce Simple(sm)
http://WWW.Commerco.Com/



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>