On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, James Couzens wrote:
On Mon, 2004-11-08 at 15:17 -0800, william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, jpinkerton wrote:
http://www.spf.pobox.com/senderid.html
Anyone notice anything?
As expected, Meng did not say he opposes SenderID or that its bad and the
only thing he did is as he asked us he put a link to OpenSPF statement to
indicate position of those at SPF community that oppose it.
Unfortunetly OpenSPF.org does not show who is behind it and who supports
the position shown on that page. I strongly recommend providing ability
for those who are interested to be able to "sign" that statement and have
their name added below it in the same way it was done here:
http://www.whois.sc/verisign-dns/
I have written a CGI where people can submit their name, email address
(not to be displayed but for verification purposes should the need
arise), and their organizational affiliation (if applicable).
Add small comment field (but limit its size to say 100), otherwise people
will start using organization field for comments. And if its not too much
extra programming I think requirying reply (i.e. verification) for
signature to be fully accepted is good idea.
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net