In
<C6DDA43B91BFDA49AA2F1E473732113E010BED03(_at_)mou1wnexm05(_dot_)vcorp(_dot_)ad(_dot_)vrsn(_dot_)com>
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com> writes:
That is exactly the problem - it is not safe with PRA
algorithm and has
possibility of significant operational impact (on senders
whose email is imroperly rejected)
Rubbish. This is not about FSF ideology, in the real world the spec works
fine from an engineering point of view.
Why are you bringing up the red-herring of the "FSF ideology"?
Why evidence do you have that "in the real word the PRA works fine
from an engineering point of view"? All evidence that I have seen so
far shows that the PRA doesn't work fine in the real world. Granted,
the testing of the PRA so far has been extremely limited, but that's
another problem with the PRA.
-wayne