spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit

2004-11-03 15:17:02
In 
<C6DDA43B91BFDA49AA2F1E473732113E010BED03(_at_)mou1wnexm05(_dot_)vcorp(_dot_)ad(_dot_)vrsn(_dot_)com>
 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com> writes:

That is exactly the problem - it is not safe with PRA 
algorithm and has 
possibility of significant operational impact (on senders 
whose email is imroperly rejected)

Rubbish. This is not about FSF ideology, in the real world the spec works
fine from an engineering point of view. 

Why are you bringing up the red-herring of the "FSF ideology"?

Why evidence do you have that "in the real word the PRA works fine
from an engineering point of view"?   All evidence that I have seen so
far shows that the PRA doesn't work fine in the real world.  Granted,
the testing of the PRA so far has been extremely limited, but that's
another problem with the PRA.



-wayne


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>