RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.

I wrote:
> > This means that SPF2 implementations should not check the MAIL FROM,
> > only the PRA. Is that intentional?
My statement was incorrect because for the MAIL FROM scope the v=spf1 record
is taken if there is no v=spf2.0/mfrom.

William wrote:

> What SPF2 implementations? Name one please!
I don't know if there already exists one.

Roger