Wow, that looks like it's meant to cause trouble for anyone checking SPF.
I guess that will be a good test case to see how various implementations
handle it.
gregc
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Hector Santos wrote:
Does CLASSMATE.COM have a redundant SPF record?:
D:\p32\socket\iftp\release>spf classmates.com
"v=spf1 mx ptr include:mail.classmates.com -all"
D:\p32\socket\iftp\release>spf mail.classmates.com
"v=spf1 mx ptr include:classmates.com -all"
Whats the point here?
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
--
--
Greg Connor
gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org
Everyone says that having power is a great responsibility. This is a lot
of bunk. Responsibility is when someone can blame you if something goes
wrong. When you have power you are surrounded by people whose job it is
to take the blame for your mistakes. If they're smart, that is.
-- Cerebus, "On Governing"