-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Greg
Connor
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 5:52 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] ClassMates.com
Wow, that looks like it's meant to cause trouble for anyone checking SPF.
I guess that will be a good test case to see how various implementations
handle it.
gregc
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Hector Santos wrote:
Does CLASSMATE.COM have a redundant SPF record?:
D:\p32\socket\iftp\release>spf classmates.com
"v=spf1 mx ptr include:mail.classmates.com -all"
D:\p32\socket\iftp\release>spf mail.classmates.com
"v=spf1 mx ptr include:classmates.com -all"
Whats the point here?
We see records like this pretty frequently on spf-help. It comes from just
pushing the "I believe" button on whatever the wizard gives you.
Someone ought to contact them since this will be unlikely to produce the
result they wanted. Any volunteers?
Scott Kitterman