----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] FairUCE
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, jpinkerton wrote:
rarely challenges legitimate mail. A future version will incorporate
Sender
Policy Framework (SPF) or similar sender identification systems;
SPF-enabled
domains will not require a challenge. Challenges are sent using a
dedicated
Whew. So only the alpha version is bad. Sounds reasonable when they
implement SPF.
Yes - and it's another case of someone else *possibly* using spf records for
something that wasn't in the SPF designers heads.
BTW -
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/technology/4072647.stm
Slainte,
JohnP.
johnp(_at_)idimo(_dot_)com
ICQ 313355492