Re: FairUCE2004-12-06 14:12:45Quoting jpinkerton <johnp(_at_)idimo(_dot_)com>: Yes - and it's another case of someone else *possibly* using spf records for something that wasn't in the SPF designers heads. Sounds to me like the only thing they're using SPF for is to say that if SPF is in place to provide forgery prevention they'll forego confirmation. Not an unreasonable decision, especially once we get to the point where MTAs will use SMTP AUTH to prevent in-server spoofing...
|
|