Hmm, i guess i misunderstood things here, mixing up sender-id with spf.
I assumed sender-id is spf, but it isn't the same i guess, so the
licensing issues don't hold.
Bye,
Mipam.
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Mipam wrote:
Hi,
I wonder about wide spread adoption of SPF.
The license of MS isn't too friendly and already apache and debian
announced they cannot implement it because of licensing issues.
Domainkeys from Yahoo seems to have an easier license ....
Any chance the license will be changed or?
How do you folks look towards this issue?
Bye,
Mipam.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com