On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 10:43, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Perhaps a better approach might be to try and resolve why your emails
got rejected. Are there invalid spf records involved? Is something at
list.drzeus.cx misconfigured ?
<wbsd-devel(_at_)list(_dot_)drzeus(_dot_)cx>:
Connected to 213.115.189.212 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 417 SPF error mailout.stusta.mhn.de: Address does not
pass the
+Sender Policy Framework
I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.
<drzeus-wbsd(_at_)drzeus(_dot_)cx>:
Connected to 213.115.189.212 but sender was rejected.
Remote host said: 417 SPF error mailout.stusta.mhn.de: Address does not
pass the
+Sender Policy Framework
I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.
<-- snip -->
IMHO lists rejecting emails based on some non-standard extension don't
belong into MAINTAINERS.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk(_at_)stusta(_dot_)de>
--- linux-2.6.10-mm2-full/MAINTAINERS.old 2005-01-10 19:20:32.000000000
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-mm2-full/MAINTAINERS 2005-01-10 19:26:24.000000000 +0100
@@ -2539,8 +2539,6 @@
W83L51xD SD/MMC CARD INTERFACE DRIVER
P: Pierre Ossman
-M: drzeus-wbsd(_at_)drzeus(_dot_)cx
-L: wbsd-devel(_at_)list(_dot_)drzeus(_dot_)cx
W: http://projects.drzeus.cx/wbsd
S: Maintained
--
http://dmoz.org/profiles/pollei.html
http://sourceforge.net/users/stephen_pollei/
http://www.orkut.com/Profile.aspx?uid=2455954990164098214
http://stephen_pollei.home.comcast.net/
GPG Key fingerprint = EF6F 1486 EC27 B5E7 E6E1 3C01 910F 6BB5 4A7D 9677
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part