SPF Discuss (date)
January 28, 2005
- Re: SPF MTA Support - spf.pobox.com content update request, Theo Schlossnagle, 15:13
- RE: SPF MTA Support - spf.pobox.com content update request, Scott Kitterman, 14:21
- Re: SPF MTA Support - spf.pobox.com content update request, Steven G. Willis, 14:13
- SPF MTA Support - spf.pobox.com content update request, Scott Kitterman, 14:00
- Microsoft publishes SPFv1 records, Julian Mehnle, 13:31
January 27, 2005
- Re: SpamCop recommends SPF (and/or DomainKeys), Kaas Baichtal, 13:55
- Re: SpamCop recommends SPF (and/or DomainKeys), Stuart D. Gathman, 13:00
- SPF/SRS at Mozilla.org, Scott Kitterman, 12:23
- RE: SpamCop recommends SPF (and/or DomainKeys), Scott Kitterman, 06:46
- Re: SpamCop recommends SPF (and/or DomainKeys), David Woodhouse, 01:56
January 26, 2005
- Re: SpamCop recommends SPF (and/or DomainKeys), Nick Phillips, 23:57
- RE: [spf-discuss] SpamCop recommends SPF (and/or DomainKeys), Julian Mehnle, 18:24
- Re: SpamCop recommends SPF (and/or DomainKeys), Stuart D. Gathman, 17:07
- Re: SpamCop recommends SPF (and/or DomainKeys), Stuart D. Gathman, 17:02
- SpamCop recommends SPF (and/or DomainKeys), Julian Mehnle, 15:56
January 24, 2005
- Re: Re: Conflict with PAM on Exim, Doug Jolley, 18:09
- Re: Conflict with PAM on Exim, Sam Morris, 16:38
- Conflict with PAM on Exim, Doug Jolley, 16:18
- Re: Off-topic: mydnsbl (my "too many failures BL"), administrator, 15:48
- Sendmail-patch URL, Radu Hociung, 14:01
- (unknown), spf-discuss, 03:03
January 17, 2005
- Re: Off-topic: mydnsbl (my "too many failures BL") moving from investigation to testing, Greg Connor, 22:46
- would appreciate feedback, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 20:20
- New spam honeypot project., Dustin D. Trammell, 16:15
- Re: Off-topic: mydnsbl (my "too many failures BL") moving from investigation to testing, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:27
- Re: Contact us text on spf.pobox.com, Jacques Marneweck, 15:03
- Re: Off-topic: mydnsbl (my "too many failures BL") moving from investigation to testing, administrator, 15:01
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, administrator, 07:58
- Re: verizon blocks mail from europe, Rene Barbier, 07:49
- RE: verizon blocks mail from europe, Julian Mehnle, 07:47
- verizon blocks mail from europe, Koen Martens, 07:31
January 16, 2005
- Off-topic: mydnsbl (my "too many failures BL") moving from investigation to testing, Greg Connor, 16:06
- Re: Contact us text on spf.pobox.com, Meng Weng Wong, 14:15
- RE: SPF icon, Stephen Pollei, 11:40
- Council: Weekly Meeting on 2005-01-15, Julian Mehnle, 10:29
- RE: SPF icon, william(at)elan.net, 03:54
January 15, 2005
- RE: SPF icon, Michel Py, 22:47
- RE: SPF icon, Michel Py, 22:04
- Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., David Woodhouse, 04:00
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, David Woodhouse, 03:55
- Contact us text on spf.pobox.com, Koen Martens, 03:03
January 14, 2005
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, william(at)elan.net, 21:42
- Re: The new DNS RR type again, Nick Phillips, 21:18
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Julian Mehnle, 19:46
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, william(at)elan.net, 18:05
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, David Woodhouse, 17:36
- Re: SPF icon, william(at)elan.net, 16:48
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Julian Mehnle, 16:11
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:35
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:32
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, william(at)elan.net, 14:31
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, william(at)elan.net, 14:25
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, william(at)elan.net, 14:12
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Julian Mehnle, 14:04
- RE: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Julian Mehnle, 13:58
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:39
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:37
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Julian Mehnle, 13:24
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Julian Mehnle, 13:17
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:15
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Julian Mehnle, 13:03
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:59
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Julian Mehnle, 12:53
- RE: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Julian Mehnle, 12:26
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Hannah Schroeter, 11:28
- Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Hannah Schroeter, 11:22
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:20
- Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Hannah Schroeter, 11:18
- Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Stuart D. Gathman, 11:15
- RE: SPF icon, Julian Mehnle, 11:15
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 11:14
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Hannah Schroeter, 11:08
- Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Hannah Schroeter, 11:02
- Re: Filtering messages that FAIL SPF checks, Hannah Schroeter, 11:00
- Re: SPF icon, Hannah Schroeter, 10:56
- Re: SPF icon, Hannah Schroeter, 10:54
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, william(at)elan.net, 10:10
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, william(at)elan.net, 09:56
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, wayne, 09:55
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Scott Kitterman, 09:33
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Julian Mehnle, 09:33
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, wayne, 09:14
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:11
- Re: Deferring "temperror" results during record evaluation (was: MX mechanism and spotty DNS server), Stuart D. Gathman, 08:43
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, william(at)elan.net, 08:33
- Re: SPF icon, wayne, 08:27
- RE: The new DNS RR type again, Julian Mehnle, 08:08
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Julian Mehnle, 07:55
- Re: The new DNS RR type again, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07:53
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Julian Mehnle, 07:35
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Daniel Taylor, 07:28
- RE: The new DNS RR type again, Julian Mehnle, 07:09
- Re: Setting a 2821 MAIL FROM different from the 2822 From: with Outlook, terry, 06:10
- Re: SPF icon, Chris Haynes, 05:31
- Re: SPF icon, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:57
- RE: SPF icon, Michel Py, 01:03
- Re: The new DNS RR type again, Nick Phillips, 00:03
January 13, 2005
- RE: SPF icon, william(at)elan.net, 23:38
- RE: SPF icon, Michel Py, 21:05
- Re: Setting a 2821 MAIL FROM different from the 2822 From: with Outlook, Dave Crocker, 20:10
- RE: Setting a 2821 MAIL FROM different from the 2822 From: with Outlook, Julian Mehnle, 19:28
- RE: The new DNS RR type again, Julian Mehnle, 19:18
- Deferring "temperror" results during record evaluation (was: MX mechanism and spotty DNS server), Julian Mehnle, 18:58
- Re: Filtering messages that FAIL SPF checks, Meng Weng Wong, 18:41
- Re: Filtering messages that FAIL SPF checks, Meng Weng Wong, 18:40
- Filtering messages that FAIL SPF checks, James Couzens, 17:34
- Re: SPF icon, Jason Gurtz, 14:59
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Roger Moser, 14:57
- MX mechanism and spotty DNS server, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:48
- Re: Setting a 2821 MAIL FROM different from the 2822 From: with Outlook, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:30
- Re: The new DNS RR type again, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 14:17
- RE: SPF icon, Julian Mehnle, 14:03
- Setting a 2821 MAIL FROM different from the 2822 From: with Outlook, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 13:52
- RE: Re: FW: spf-help mailing list archives should be public, Scott Kitterman, 12:36
- RE: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Scott Kitterman, 12:10
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:51
- Re: SPF icon, Jason Gurtz, 11:42
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:41
- Re: Zonecuts specified in SPF draft, Roger Moser, 08:54
- Re: Received: lines in a bounce, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01:30
January 12, 2005
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 22:01
- RE: using received headers to determine sending mta, william(at)elan.net, 19:13
- SPF icon, Julian Mehnle, 18:52
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, william(at)elan.net, 18:32
- spf_local_policy docs?, spf, 18:29
- Re: FW: spf-help mailing list archives should be public, Mark Shewmaker, 17:05
- RE: Received: lines in a bounce, Julian Mehnle, 16:44
- Received: lines in a bounce, Greg Connor, 16:13
- Re: libspf2 incorrectly handling certain queries, Greg Connor, 16:00
- Re: using received headers to determine sending mta, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 13:30
- Re: using received headers to determine sending mta, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 13:28
- libspf2 incorrectly handling certain queries, Rick Cooper, 13:27
- Re[2]: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:58
- Re: using received headers to determine sending mta, David Woodhouse, 11:21
- Re: using received headers to determine sending mta, Chris Haynes, 11:09
- Re: using received headers to determine sending mta, jpinkerton, 10:54
- Re: using received headers to determine sending mta, David Woodhouse, 10:44
- Re: using received headers to determine sending mta, jpinkerton, 10:16
- RE: using received headers to determine sending mta, Dan Field, 09:53
- Re: using received headers to determine sending mta, Chris Haynes, 09:44
- using received headers to determine sending mta, Dan Field, 09:20
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, administrator, 09:11
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Paul Vixie, 07:53
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:15
- Re: Re[2]: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, David Woodhouse, 05:59
- Re[2]: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Chris Drake, 05:50
- Re[2]: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Chris Drake, 05:38
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, william(at)elan.net, 04:11
January 11, 2005
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Mike Markley, 23:05
- Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Stuart D. Gathman, 16:50
- Re: "SPF Sender Authentication Deployment Recommendations" draft, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:04
- SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 14:49
- RE: The new DNS RR type again, Julian Mehnle, 12:05
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, wayne, 11:26
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Daniel Taylor, 09:38
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:32
- The new DNS RR type again (Was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 09:12
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Hannah Schroeter, 09:00
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:43
- Re: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Hannah Schroeter, 08:39
- Re: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Hannah Schroeter, 08:10
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Hannah Schroeter, 08:02
- Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Hannah Schroeter, 07:55
- Re: Re: What DB-Backed forwarding is., Hannah Schroeter, 07:52
- Re: "SPF Sender Authentication Deployment Recommendations" draft, Koen Martens, 00:41
January 10, 2005
- RE: "SPF Sender Authentication Deployment Recommendations" draft, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:38
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Kaas Baichtal, 14:34
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, jpinkerton, 14:04
- RE: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Kaas Baichtal, 13:13
- Re: [2.6 patch] remove SPF-using wbsd lists from MAINTAINERS, Stephen Pollei, 12:55
- Re: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, John A. Martin, 07:53
- RE: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 05:58
January 09, 2005
- Re: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, John A. Martin, 21:43
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 18:00
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 13:57
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, administrator, 13:38
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, wayne, 13:18
- RE: "SPF Sender Authentication Deployment Recommendations" draft, Julian Mehnle, 12:33
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Theo Schlossnagle, 10:50
- RE: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Julian Mehnle, 10:28
- SPF + Local user X another location, Mike, 10:26
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Benjamin Franz, 10:14
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Theo Schlossnagle, 10:06
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, jpinkerton, 09:40
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 08:59
- RE: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Julian Mehnle, 08:40
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 08:00
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Theo Schlossnagle, 07:56
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Karl Prince, 07:40
- RE: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, Julian Mehnle, 07:34
- Inbound and outbound SPF checking (was: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?), Julian Mehnle, 07:27
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Karl Prince, 06:36
- Re: Is anyone else getting DoS'd by relay attacks?, David Woodhouse, 04:12
January 07, 2005
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:46
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Greg Connor, 11:58
- Re: Re: draft of email security glossary for review, Michael Hammer, 08:20
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Scott Kitterman, 07:34
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Scott Kitterman, 07:21
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Scott Kitterman, 07:12
- Re: draft of email security glossary for review, william(at)elan.net, 06:39
- META Signatures - New Website, Mail-Lists, Techical Spec Updates, william(at)elan.net, 06:29
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 06:19
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Julian Mehnle, 06:13
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Hector Santos, 06:04
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Julian Mehnle, 05:51
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Julian Mehnle, 05:45
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 05:03
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Hector Santos, 04:40
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Hector Santos, 04:03
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Greg Connor, 00:28
January 06, 2005
- Re: External mass mailings question, Mike Markley, 20:06
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Julian Mehnle, 19:10
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:48
- Re: External mass mailings question, Jonathan Gardner, 16:07
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Julian Mehnle, 15:24
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Julian Mehnle, 15:23
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Mike Markley, 14:47
- 2004-12-22: SPF Council elected and organized, Julian Mehnle, 10:29
January 05, 2005
- Council: Management of the mailing lists, Julian Mehnle, 20:37
- RE: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 17:01
- RE: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 16:48
- Re: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, John A. Martin, 16:27
- RE: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:23
- RE: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 15:12
- RE: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 14:41
- RE: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 14:39
- Re: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Leonard Mills, 12:43
- Re: Mailserver Question, administrator, 10:53
- RE: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Scott Kitterman, 10:36
- RE: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Greg Connor, 10:24
- Re: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, John A. Martin, 09:22
- Re: Re: [draft-schlitt-spf-classic] Small change in Received-SPF heade, Andy Bakun, 09:07
- Re: [draft-schlitt-spf-classic] Small change in Received-SPF heade, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08:16
- Re: [draft-schlitt-spf-classic] Small change in Received-SPF header, Andy Bakun, 07:44
- Re: Re: [draft-schlitt-spf-classic] Small change in Received-SPF heade, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 07:30
- RE: [draft-schlitt-spf-classic] Small change in Received-SPF heade, Julian Mehnle, 06:53
- RE: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 06:44
- Re: [draft-schlitt-spf-classic] Small change in Received-SPF heade, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:22
- RE: [draft-schlitt-spf-classic] Small change in Received-SPF header, Julian Mehnle, 06:13
- [draft-schlitt-spf-classic] Small change in Received-SPF header, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:56
January 04, 2005
- Re: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Greg Connor, 21:16
- Sorry, nurv, 19:13
- RE: Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 18:38
- Architectural issues with the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 18:30
- The "Received-SPF:" and "Authentication-Results:" headers, Julian Mehnle, 18:20
- [Fwd: Re: 2nd Notice # 4K2430], nurv, 18:11
- SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 14:49
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Nick Phillips, 14:35
- Re: SPF aware userland mailfilter script, James Couzens, 07:14
- SPF aware userland mailfilter script, James Couzens, 07:04
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, jpinkerton, 06:44
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Scott Kitterman, 06:30
January 03, 2005
- RE: latest and greatest: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00, Julian Mehnle, 19:59
- External mass mailings question, nurv, 19:15
- Re: "SPF Sender Authentication Deployment Recommendations" draft, william(at)elan.net, 18:51
- Re: Which standard to implement?, wayne, 18:19
- Re: "SPF Sender Authentication Deployment Recommendations" draft, Leonard Mills, 17:57
- "SPF Sender Authentication Deployment Recommendations" draft, Mark, 17:43
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Nick Phillips, 16:53
- The IETF has published draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, wayne, 16:34
- Re: SPF For Sendmail, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:11
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Scott Kitterman, 08:47
- Re: Which standard to implement?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 04:19
- Re: Broken Mail Servers..., Lennon - Orcon, 04:18
- Re: Broken Mail Servers..., wayne, 03:25
- 2004: The Year That Promised Email Authentication, wayne, 03:23
- Which standard to implement?, Peter Karsai, 02:05
- Re: SPF For Postfix on Debian, jpinkerton, 01:03
January 02, 2005
- Re: SPF For Postfix on Debian, Mike Markley, 15:51
- Re: SPF For Postfix on Debian, Nick Phillips, 15:50
- SPF For Postfix on Debian, jpinkerton, 14:28
- RE: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Seth Goodman, 13:36
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, william(at)elan.net, 02:25
- Re: Should I include major ISPs in SPF for our hosted domains?, Nick Phillips, 00:17