Hi, Sam. Thanks for the response.
It looks like you are missing -lpam from the
flags used for linking.
I agree with you that the compiler complaints
would seem to indicate that something like that
is the problem. However, I don't think it is for
2 reasons. First, I do have lpam linked in.
Secondly, if that were the problem; then, it
would still be a problem when I remove support
for libspf2. It's only when I add support for
libspf2 that it starts to complain. Without
libspf2 support it compiles with PAM support just
fine. Also, if I remove PAM support; then, it
will compile just fine with libspf2 support.
IOW, it's only when I have both PAM support and
libspf2 support that I get the compiler
complaint.
Just to make sure that I'm not missing something,
here's what the section of my Exim makefile
dealing with PAM looks like:
SUPPORT_PAM=yes
# You probably need to add -lpam to EXTRALIBS,
and in some releases of
# GNU/Linux -ldl is also needed.
EXTRALIBS_EXIM=-lpam -ldl
That's enough, right?
Thanks again for the input.
... doug
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250