On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:05:24PM +0000,
Paul Vixie <paul(_at_)vix(_dot_)com> wrote
a message of 48 lines which said:
moreover, there should be two documents. one an FYI describing SPF
as it is (TXT RR based), and one a proposed standard recommending a
new RR type.
This seems quite reasonable and it has already been proposed but
without any reaction:
http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com/200410/0362.html
http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com/200410/0272.html