On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:44:10AM -0600,
Andy Bakun <spf(_at_)leave-it-to-grace(_dot_)com> wrote
a message of 38 lines which said:
This scheme falls down in the face of spammers using SPF, which we
know at least some do now
Of course. See the figures I provided.
The simplistic mapping above WILL have to be changed when SPF is
more widely deployed.
I do not think so.
In the mean time, you risk false positives and ignored email
Do you really now what is bayesian filtering? If no, think that a bad
score for one word is not enough to classify a message.