Re: Testing SPF/SRS2005-02-21 14:25:18On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 13:50 -0700, David MacQuigg wrote: I think the ball has been dropped. SPF was brilliantly conceived and promoted. SRS was an afterthought, and is not being properly supported. SRS was a required part of what's needed to make SPF work. You can't claim that SPF was brilliantly conceived and promoted in the _absence_ of SRS. And I agree that the ball has been dropped. SPF isn't workable. -- dwmw2
|
|