Sorry, but the last version available for download (1.2.0pre1) does
NOT compile at all (at least not under VC6 or VS2003) as there are
many symbols NOT declared. There are several files missing in this
distribution.
Version 1.0.4 does compile and run.
And I think that is the version in question in the original post.
Andreas
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:47:47 +0100, Hannah Schroeter
<hannah(_at_)schlund(_dot_)de> wrote:
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:03:41PM -0800, ecsd(_at_)transbay(_dot_)net wrote:
libspf2 is useless without the proper header files to define symbols used
in the code. The statement on the site "won't compile but this is the
reference version" is irritating if it is 8 months old with no motion.
So, what libspfX should I use?
[...]
On Jan 31, 2005, I imported libspf2 v1.0.4 into our company's development
repository, which was the one which IIRC was referred to then on the
libspf2 site.
It compiled well enough and some tests written on my own worked, and
we'll soon test-drive it in real operation.
[...]
Kind regards,
Hannah.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
--
--------------------------------------
Leon Enterprise Anti-Spam Server
http://www.uniwares.com.br