Re: Re: DNS load research

What we're discussing at the moment is to limit the worst case
to about 10..25 queries, with classic-spf-00 it's still 110
(10 mx or ptr, each with 10 names).

And I think that these kinds of limits make a lot of sense, but aren'twe talking about each of these limits per mail originator?

A very bad dialogue could go MAIL FROM: / RSET / MAIL FROM: / RSET ...until whatever internal limits on transactions the MTA may have, if any.


--Marc

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Response to DDoS using SPF, (continued) Re: Response to DDoS using SPF, Chris Haynes Re: Response to DDoS using SPF, David MacQuigg RE: Response to DDoS using SPF, Scott Kitterman Off Topic - English Syntax, David MacQuigg Re: Off Topic - English Syntax, Chris Haynes Re: Off Topic - English Syntax, David MacQuigg Re: Response to DDoS using SPF, Michael Hammer Re: Re: DNS load research, Andy Bakun Re: Re: DNS load research, Marc Chametzky Re: DNS load research, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: DNS load research, Marc Chametzky <= Re: Re: DNS load research, Alex van den Bogaerdt Re: Re: DNS load research, David Macquigg Re: Re: DNS load research, Stuart D. Gathman RE: Re: DNS load research, Scott Kitterman RE: Re: DNS load research, Stuart D. Gathman Re: Re: DNS load research, David Macquigg RE: Re: DNS load research, Scott Kitterman Re: DNS load research, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: DNS load research, Ralf Doeblitz Re: Re: DNS load research, Radu Hociung

Previous by Date:	Re: DNS load research, Frank Ellermann
Next by Date:	RE: Re: DNS load research, Scott Kitterman
Previous by Thread:	Re: DNS load research, Frank Ellermann
Next by Thread:	Re: Re: DNS load research, Alex van den Bogaerdt
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]