Chris Haynes wrote:
rg(_at_)mdpd(_dot_)com asked:
<snip>
I, personally, am not yet convinced that there has been a strong enough case
made to show that the current SPF1 system is inadequate or seriously 'at risk'
in this respect. Maybe I missed some convincing scenarios...
And the ever hated ME TO (aka seconded)
Terry
The last thing we should be doing is raising FUD about the current version
without _very strong_ reason.
I'd far rather see progress on getting the existing system written up and
published as an RFC.
Chris Haynes
p.s. Sorry - just taking the opportunity to vent my spleen at the end there.
Nothing to do with you, Rudy.
p.p.s BTW, it would be _much_ more convenient if you could post in plain text,
not HTML. Thanks
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
--
Terry Fielder
terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com
Associate Director Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
Fax: (416) 441-9085