RE: OT (was: IESG evaluation of SPF)

Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Julian Mehnle wrote:
> > > [odd primes]
> > > It works for 3, 5, 7 and infinitely many other primes,
> > > but it does not work for 1 [...]
> > I'd contest that. ;-)
> As in <http://purl.net/net/eisa/8578> "at the beginning
> of the 20th century" vs. <http://purl.net/net/eisa/40> ?
Ok, the rationale at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrimeNumber.html
convinced me.  I give up, you win. ;-)