Re: OT

Julian Mehnle wrote:

> Ok, the rationale at
> http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrimeNumber.html
> convinced me.
Bah, broken HTML pages are never convincing, I cannot read it,
and Eric Weisstein is an ordinary human like everybody else.

> I give up, you win. ;-)
You shouldn't, it's perfectly okay if you define prime(0) = 1
where needed.  As long as prime(1) = 2 all is fine, bye, Frank