RE: Broken SPF Record?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
> [mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of
> william(at)elan.net
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 4:54 PM
> To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
> Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Broken SPF Record?
>
>
>
> On Tue, 10 May 2005, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> > Is this record broken?
> >
> > godaddy.com text "v=spf1 a:69.64.33.132 a:66.98.160.100 a:64.202.160.108
> > ip4:64.202.167.0/24 ip4:64.202.166.0/24 ip4:64.202.165.0/24
> > ip4:64.202.163.0/24 ip4:64.202.189.0/24 ~all"
> >
> > a: with an IP address is a syntax error isn't it?
> Wayne recommends using ip4 for single ip address, but using 'a' does not
> mean its broken - after all single ip address is valid hostname.
>
> --
Yes, but a lookup of an a record for 69.64.33.132 returns NXDOMAIN in Dig.
That's going to be an error condition then (PermError)?

Scott Kitterman