SPF Discuss (thread)
Fwd [from ietf-mxcomp]: overall HELO FAIL,
Julian Mehnle,
2005/05/26
- overall HELO FAIL, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/26
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, Terry Fielder, 2005/05/26
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, wayne, 2005/05/26
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/26
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/27
- Re: Re: overall HELO FAIL, wayne, 2005/05/27
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/27
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/27
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, Hector Santos, 2005/05/27
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, Dennis Willson, 2005/05/27
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, Ralf Doeblitz, 2005/05/28
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/27
- Re: Re: overall HELO FAIL, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/27
- reviews (was: overall HELO FAIL), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/27
- Re: reviews (was: overall HELO FAIL), wayne, 2005/05/27
- Re: reviews, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/28
- Re: Re: overall HELO FAIL, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/27
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/27
- Re: Re: overall HELO FAIL, wayne, 2005/05/27
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/27
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/27
- Sarcasm (was: overall HELO FAIL), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/27
- Re: Re: overall HELO FAIL, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/31
- Re: overall HELO FAIL, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/27
Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro,
Julian Mehnle,
2005/05/26
- Re: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/26
- Re: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/26
- Re: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro, wayne, 2005/05/27
- Re: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/27
- Re: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/27
- Re: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/27
- Re: Re: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro, wayne, 2005/05/27
- scope=mfrom is taboo (was: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/27
- Re: scope=mfrom is taboo, wayne, 2005/05/27
- Re: scope=mfrom is taboo, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/27
- Re: Re: scope=mfrom is taboo, wayne, 2005/05/28
- Re: scope=mfrom is taboo, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/29
- Re: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro, John A. Martin, 2005/05/27
- Re: Re: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/27
- Re: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro, John A. Martin, 2005/05/27
- Re: Re: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/27
- Re: Identity codes, plus a new %{x} macro, John A. Martin, 2005/05/27
Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames,
Constantine A. Murenin,
2005/05/24
- Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/24
- Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Constantine A. Murenin, 2005/05/25
- Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/25
- Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/25
- Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Constantine A. Murenin, 2005/05/25
- Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/25
- Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Constantine A. Murenin, 2005/05/25
- Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/25
- Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Constantine A. Murenin, 2005/05/25
- Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/25
- IPv6 with 'a' or do we need 'aaaa' ? (Was: Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames), Jeroen Massar, 2005/05/26
- Re: IPv6 with 'a' or do we need 'aaaa' ?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/26
- Re: Re: IPv6 with 'a' or do we need 'aaaa' ?, Jeroen Massar, 2005/05/26
- Re: Re: IPv6 with 'a' or do we need 'aaaa' ?, wayne, 2005/05/26
- Re: IPv6 with 'a' or do we need 'aaaa' ? (Was: Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames), Constantine A. Murenin, 2005/05/29
- Re: Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/26
Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues.,
wayne,
2005/05/20
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., wayne, 2005/05/20
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/20
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Chris Haynes, 2005/05/20
- RE: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Mark, 2005/05/20
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/20
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Chris Haynes, 2005/05/21
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/21
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/21
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Bill Taroli, 2005/05/21
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/21
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Bill Taroli, 2005/05/21
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/21
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/20
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Michael Hammer, 2005/05/20
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/20
- Re: Results from the SPF council review on I-D issues., Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/25
- For SPF Council review: Section 9.3.1.2 and the 63 chars limit for localpart crypto schemes, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/25
BTFOOM (was: SPF-council IRC logs for 2005-05-18),
Frank Ellermann,
2005/05/19
- Re: BTFOOM, wayne, 2005/05/20
- Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/20
- Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/21
- Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/21
- Re: Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/22
- Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/22
- Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/22
- Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/22
- Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/23
- 63/64 and two minor -01 problems (was: BTFOOM), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/23
- Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, wayne, 2005/05/24
- Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/24
- Re: Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, wayne, 2005/05/24
- RE: Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/24
- Re: Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, wayne, 2005/05/24
- Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/25
- exp= modifier and processing limits, wayne, 2005/05/27
- RE: BTFOOM, Mark, 2005/05/20
- Re: BTFOOM, Raymond Neeves, 2005/05/20
- RE: BTFOOM, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/20
- Receiver Policy in the SPF spec (Was: BTFOOM), wayne, 2005/05/20
- Re: Receiver Policy in the SPF spec, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/20
- Re: Receiver Policy in the SPF spec, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/21
- Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/20
- RE: Re: BTFOOM, Mark, 2005/05/20
- For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN (was: BTFOOM), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/22
- RE: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN (was: BTFOOM), Mark, 2005/05/22
- RE: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN (was: BTFOOM), Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/22
- Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN (was: BTFOOM), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/22
- Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN (was: BTFOOM), Bill Taroli, 2005/05/22
- Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/22
- Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/22
- Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/22
- RE: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/22
- Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/22
- Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN (was: BTFOOM), Bill Taroli, 2005/05/22
- Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/22
- Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN (was: BTFOOM), wayne, 2005/05/31
- Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/31
- Re: Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/21
- Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/22
Re: Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean,
Scott Kitterman,
2005/05/18
- Re: Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, wayne, 2005/05/20
- Re: Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Arjen de Korte, 2005/05/21
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/21
- Re: Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Arjen de Korte, 2005/05/21
- Re: Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, wayne, 2005/05/21
- Re: Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/22
- Re: Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Arjen de Korte, 2005/05/23
- Re: Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, wayne, 2005/05/24
- Re: Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Arjen de Korte, 2005/05/25
- Re: Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/25
- Re: Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Arjen de Korte, 2005/05/25
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/25
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Arjen de Korte, 2005/05/25
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Constantine A. Murenin, 2005/05/25
- RE: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/25
(unknown),
Scott Kitterman,
2005/05/18
- Re:, wayne, 2005/05/20
- PermError in spf-01, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/20
- RE: PermError in spf-01, Mark, 2005/05/20
- RE: PermError in spf-01, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/21
- Re: PermError in spf-01, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/21
- Re: PermError and NXDOMAIN in spf-01, wayne, 2005/05/21
- Re: PermError and NXDOMAIN in spf-01, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/21
- Re: PermError and NXDOMAIN in spf-01, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/22
- Re: PermError and NXDOMAIN in spf-01, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/21
- Re: Re: PermError and NXDOMAIN in spf-01, wayne, 2005/05/22
- Sep 22 - Jan 03 (was: PermError and NXDOMAIN in spf-01), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/22
- RE: Sep 22 - Jan 03 (was: PermError and NXDOMAIN in spf-01), John Glube, 2005/05/23
- Re: Sep 22 - Jan 03, wayne, 2005/05/24
- RE: Sep 22 - Jan 03, John Glube, 2005/05/25
- RE: Sep 22 - Jan 03, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/25
- Re: Sep 22 - Jan 03, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/25
- RE: Sep 22 - Jan 03, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/25
- RE: Sep 22 - Jan 03, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/25
- Re: Sep 22 - Jan 03, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/25
- Re: Sep 22 - Jan 03, wayne, 2005/05/25
- RE: [spa-discuss] Sep 22 - Jan 03, John Glube, 2005/05/25
- Re: Sep 22 - Jan 03, wayne, 2005/05/24
- Re: Sep 22 - Jan 03, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/25
- Re: PermError and NXDOMAIN in spf-01, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/22
- Re: PermError and NXDOMAIN in spf-01, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/22
- Re:, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/21
FYI: Email Authentication Summit - emailauthentication.org,
william(at)elan.net,
2005/05/18
- Re: FYI: Email Authentication Summit - emailauthentication.org, Michael Hammer, 2005/05/18
- Inter-operability protocol, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/18
- Re: Inter-operability protocol, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/18
- Standards Strategy, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/19
- Re: Standards Strategy, Michael Hammer, 2005/05/19
- Re: Standards Strategy, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/19
- Re: Standards Strategy, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/19
- Re: Standards Strategy, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/19
- Re: Standards Strategy, Chuck Mead, 2005/05/19
- Re: Standards Strategy, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/19
- Re: Standards Strategy, wayne, 2005/05/20
- Re: Standards Strategy, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/20
- Re: Standards Strategy, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/19
- Declaring an Identity, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/19
- Re: Declaring an Identity, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/19
- Re: Declaring an Identity, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/20
- Re: Declaring an Identity, Daniel Taylor, 2005/05/20
- Avoiding the DNS Hunt, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/20
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/20
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, Terry Fielder, 2005/05/20
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, Daniel Taylor, 2005/05/20
- Re: Declaring an Identity, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/20
- Avoiding the DNS Hunt, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/20
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, Terry Fielder, 2005/05/20
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/20
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/20
- Is the ID command hearsay ?, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/20
- Re: Is the ID command hearsay ?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/20
- Re: Is the ID command hearsay ?, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/20
- Can the ID command be trusted ?, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/21
- Re: Can the ID command be trusted ?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/21
- Alternative Neutral IDs, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/21
- Re: Alternative Neutral IDs, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/21
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/21
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/21
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/21
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/22
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/22
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/22
- Re: Avoiding the DNS Hunt, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/22
- Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/23
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/24
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/24
- Re: Email ID Declaration - Summary of Objections, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/24
- Re: Declaring an Identity, wayne, 2005/05/20
- Re: Declaring an Identity, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/20
What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?,
wayne,
2005/05/17
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/17
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, wayne, 2005/05/17
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, wayne, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, wayne, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Commerco WebMaster, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Commerco WebMaster, 2005/05/21
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/21
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, wayne, 2005/05/21
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/21
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, wayne, 2005/05/22
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/22
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/22
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/22
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/22
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/22
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/22
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/22
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/22
- RE: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/21
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/21
- Re: Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/21
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/22
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, wayne, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/20
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/21
- Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/17
- For SPF council review: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, wayne, 2005/05/22
- Re: Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/22
Time to start rejecting on neutral?,
Stuart D. Gathman,
2005/05/16
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/16
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Hector Santos, 2005/05/17
- Declude, Sendmail, Santronics (was: Time to start rejecting on neutral?), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, wayne, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Hector Santos, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Michael Hammer, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Hector Santos, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Daniel Taylor, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Hector Santos, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Daniel Taylor, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Hector Santos, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/16
- RE: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Guy, 2005/05/16
- RE: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/16
- RE: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/16
- People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean (was: Time to start rejecting on neutral?), Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/17
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean (was: Time to start rejecting on neutral?), Hector Santos, 2005/05/17
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean (was: Time to start rejecting on neutral?), Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/17
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean (was: Time to start rejecting on neutral?), Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/17
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, wayne, 2005/05/17
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/17
- RE: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean (was: Time to start rejecting on neutral?), Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/17
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/17
- RE: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/17
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, John A. Martin, 2005/05/17
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/17
- Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/17
- For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/17
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/17
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/17
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/17
- RE: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/18
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/19
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/18
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Chris Haynes, 2005/05/18
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Commerco WebMaster, 2005/05/18
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Michael Hammer, 2005/05/18
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Commerco WebMaster, 2005/05/18
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/18
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Chris Haynes, 2005/05/18
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/18
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/18
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/18
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, wayne, 2005/05/20
- Authorize (was: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/20
- Re: Authorize (was: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition), william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/20
- Re: Authorize, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/20
- Re: Re: Authorize, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/20
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/17
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, wayne, 2005/05/17
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/17
- RE: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/18
- Re: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, wayne, 2005/05/18
- Authentication vs. Authorization (was: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition), Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/20
- Re: Authentication vs. Authorization, Bill Taroli, 2005/05/21
- Re: Authentication vs. Authorization, Paul Ficinski, 2005/05/21
- RE: Authentication vs. Authorization, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/21
- Re: Authentication vs. Authorization, Paul Ficinski, 2005/05/21
- Re: Authentication vs. Authorization, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/21
- Re: Authentication vs. Authorization, wayne, 2005/05/21
- Re: Authentication vs. Authorization, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/21
- RE: Authentication vs. Authorization, Mark, 2005/05/21
- RE: Authentication vs. Authorization, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/21
- RE: For SPF Council review - PASS Definition - was: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Mark, 2005/05/18
- RE: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean (was: Time to start rejecting on neutral?), Mark, 2005/05/18
- RE: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean (was: Time to start rejecting on neutral?), Mark, 2005/05/18
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Dave Warren, 2005/05/16
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/16
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/16
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Arjen de Korte, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Hector Santos, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Hector Santos, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Arjen de Korte, 2005/05/17
- RE: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/17
- RE: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/17
- RE: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Arjen de Korte, 2005/05/17
- Re: Time to start rejecting on neutral?, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/17
Re: patch,
wayne,
2005/05/13
- Re: Re: patch, Terry Fielder, 2005/05/13
- Re: Re: patch, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/13
- Re: patch, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/13
- MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time? (was: patch), Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/14
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Chuck Mead, 2005/05/14
- RE: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Mark, 2005/05/14
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Chuck Mead, 2005/05/14
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, wayne, 2005/05/14
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/14
- RE: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Mark, 2005/05/14
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, wayne, 2005/05/14
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Hector Santos, 2005/05/14
- OT: SC (was: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/14
- Re: OT: SpamCop, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/15
- Re: OT: SpamCop, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/15
- Re: OT: SpamCop, Chuck Mead, 2005/05/15
- Re: OT: SpamCop, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/15
- Re: OT: SpamCop, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/15
- Re: OT: SpamCop, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/16
- Shared MTA policy implementation idea, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/16
- Re: Shared MTA policy implementation idea, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/16
- Re: Shared MTA policy implementation idea, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/16
- Re: Shared MTA policy implementation idea, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/16
- Simple method to prevent cross-customer forgery on shared MTAs, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/16
- Re: Simple method to prevent cross-customer forgery on shared MTAs, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/17
- Re: Simple method to prevent cross-customer forgery on shared MTAs, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/17
- Re: Simple method to prevent cross-customer forgery on shared MTAs, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/17
- Re: Simple method to prevent cross-customer forgery on shared MTAs, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/17
- Re: Shared MTA policy implementation idea, wayne, 2005/05/16
- Re: Shared MTA policy implementation idea, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/16
- SRS for postfix yet?, Mark Jeftovic, 2005/05/16
- Re: SRS for postfix yet?, John Capo, 2005/05/16
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Chris Haynes, 2005/05/15
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/15
- Re: Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Chris Haynes, 2005/05/15
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/15
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/15
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, wayne, 2005/05/15
- Re: Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, wayne, 2005/05/15
- Size of draft (was: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/15
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, wayne, 2005/05/15
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/14
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time? (was: patch), Chris Haynes, 2005/05/14
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/14
- Re: Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Chris Haynes, 2005/05/14
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/14
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, wayne, 2005/05/15
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Terry Fielder, 2005/05/16
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Chris Haynes, 2005/05/16
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, wayne, 2005/05/16
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Terry Fielder, 2005/05/16
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/17
- Re: MUST SPF checking be done during SMTP time?, wayne, 2005/05/14
- Re: Re: patch, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/14
Re: FW: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note",
william(at)elan.net,
2005/05/10
- Re: Re: FW: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", wayne, 2005/05/10
- Re: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/11
- Re: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", David MacQuigg, 2005/05/11
- Re: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", Terry Fielder, 2005/05/11
- Re: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", David MacQuigg, 2005/05/11
- Re: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/11
- Re: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", David MacQuigg, 2005/05/11
- Re: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", Terry Fielder, 2005/05/11
- Re: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", David MacQuigg, 2005/05/11
- Re: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", Terry Fielder, 2005/05/11
- RE: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/11
- Fw: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", Chris Haynes, 2005/05/10
- RE: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", Mark, 2005/05/11
- Re: FW: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note", Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/12
X-trust-previous-hop:,
Mark Shewmaker,
2005/05/10
- Re: X-trust-previous-hop:, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/10
- Re: X-trust-previous-hop:, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/10
- Re: X-trust-previous-hop:, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/10
- Re: X-trust-previous-hop:, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/10
- Re: X-trust-previous-hop:, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/10
- Re: X-trust-previous-hop:, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/10
- Re: X-trust-previous-hop:, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/10
- Re: X-trust-previous-hop:, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/10
- Re: X-trust-previous-hop:, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/10
- Re: X-trust-previous-hop:, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/12
- Re: X-trust-previous-hop:, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/10
- RE: X-trust-previous-hop:, Mark, 2005/05/11
Wildcards - Downgrade HOLD to SELL,
David MacQuigg,
2005/05/06
- Re: Wildcards - Downgrade HOLD to SELL, wayne, 2005/05/06
- Re: Wildcards - Downgrade HOLD to SELL, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/06
- Re: Wildcards - Downgrade HOLD to SELL, Commerco WebMaster, 2005/05/06
- Re: Wildcards - Downgrade HOLD to SELL, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/06
- DNS matters & Wildcards, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/06
- Re: DNS matters & Wildcards, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/06
- Re: DNS matters & Wildcards, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/06
- Re: DNS matters & Wildcards, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/07
- Re: DNS matters & Wildcards, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/08
- Re: DNS matters & Wildcards, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/09
- Re: DNS matters & Wildcards, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/09
- Authentication Headers, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/09
- Re: Authentication Headers, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/10
- Re: Authentication Headers, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/10
- Re: Wildcards - Downgrade HOLD to SELL, Ralf Doeblitz, 2005/05/07
HELO versus MAILFROM results,
Mark Shewmaker,
2005/05/03
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/04
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Marc Chametzky, 2005/05/04
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/04
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/04
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, wayne, 2005/05/04
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/04
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, wayne, 2005/05/04
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/04
- New DNS Record Types - was HELO versus MAILFROM results, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/04
- Re: New DNS Record Types - was HELO versus MAILFROM results, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/04
- SPF uses TXT records - PERIOD! - never was New DNS Record Types - was HELO versus MAILFROM results, Hector Santos, 2005/05/05
- Re: New DNS Record Types - was HELO versus MAILFROM results, wayne, 2005/05/05
- Re: New DNS Record Types - was HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/05
- Re: New DNS Record Types, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/06
- RE: New DNS Record Types, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/06
- Re: New DNS Record Types, wayne, 2005/05/06
- Re: New DNS Record Types, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/06
- Outstanding draft issues that I've missed (was: HELO versus MAILFROM results), wayne, 2005/05/05
- Re: Outstanding draft issues that I've missed (was: HELO versus MAILFROM results), Michael Elliott, 2005/05/05
- Re: Outstanding draft issues that I've missed, wayne, 2005/05/05
- Re: Outstanding draft issues that I've missed, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/05
- Re: Outstanding draft issues that I've missed (was: HELO versus MAILFROM results), Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/05
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Rene Barbier, 2005/05/04
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/04
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/04
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/04
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/04
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/04
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/04
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/05
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Daniel Taylor, 2005/05/05
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/05
- RE: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/05
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/09
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/09
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/04
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/05
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/05
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/05
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/05
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/05
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 2005/05/06
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/06
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/05
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/05
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/05
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/05
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Hector Santos, 2005/05/06
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/06
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Hector Santos, 2005/05/06
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Hector Santos, 2005/05/06
- RE: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Mark, 2005/05/07
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/07
- The point of HELO checking over simple RBL checking, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/09
- RE: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Mark, 2005/05/10
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Hector Santos, 2005/05/06
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/06
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Daniel Taylor, 2005/05/06
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/06
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Hector Santos, 2005/05/07
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/07
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Daniel Taylor, 2005/05/07
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/07
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Hector Santos, 2005/05/07
- Burden of proof (was: HELO versus MAILFROM results), Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/09
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/07
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Hector Santos, 2005/05/07
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/07
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/07
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/06
- RE: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Mark, 2005/05/06
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Mark Shewmaker, 2005/05/06
- RE: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Mark, 2005/05/06
- The point of HELO (and MAIL FROM) checking, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/09
- RE: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/04
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, wayne, 2005/05/11
- Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/12
- Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/06
-01pre5 (was: -01pre4),
Frank Ellermann,
2005/05/03
- Re: -01pre5 (was: -01pre4), wayne, 2005/05/03
- Re: -01pre5, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/04
- Re: Re: -01pre5, wayne, 2005/05/05
- Re: Re: -01pre5, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/05
- Re: Re: -01pre5, wayne, 2005/05/05
- Re: -01pre5, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/05
- Re: Re: -01pre5, wayne, 2005/05/05
- For SPF council review: MUST accept source routes, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/05
- changes since draft-lentczner-spf-00, wayne, 2005/05/07
- Can somebody create a consolidated, incremental changelog? (was: changes since draft-lentczner-spf-00), Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/08
- Re: Can somebody create a consolidated, incremental changelog?, wayne, 2005/05/08
- Re: Can somebody create a consolidated, incremental changelog?, wayne, 2005/05/08
- Re: -01pre5, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/06
- NOT RECOMMENDED (was: -01pre5), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/07
- Re: NOT RECOMMENDED, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/07
- Re: NOT RECOMMENDED, wayne, 2005/05/07
- Re: NOT RECOMMENDED, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/07
- Re: NOT RECOMMENDED, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/07
- For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/07
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/07
- Re: Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, wayne, 2005/05/08
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/08
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/08
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/08
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, wayne, 2005/05/08
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/08
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/09
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, wayne, 2005/05/09
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, wayne, 2005/05/09
- RE: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/09
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/09
- RE: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/09
- SUBMITTER patented ?? was For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/10
- RE: SUBMITTER patented ?? was For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/10
- RE: SUBMITTER patented ??, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/10
- RE: SUBMITTER patented ??, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/10
- Re: SUBMITTER patented ?? was For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, wayne, 2005/05/10
- "additional-scopes" modifier (was: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED), Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/09
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/09
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/09
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/10
- Scoping Syntax for spf1 records (was: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED), william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/10
- Re: Scoping Syntax for spf1 records, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/10
- Re: Re: Scoping Syntax for spf1 records, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/10
- Re: Scoping Syntax for spf1 records, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/10
- Re: Re: Scoping Syntax for spf1 records, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/10
- Re: Scoping Syntax for spf1 records, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/12
- Re: Re: Scoping Syntax for spf1 records, wayne, 2005/05/11
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/10
- options, scopes, protocols, flags, properties, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/10
- Re: options, scopes, protocols, flags, properties, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/10
- Re: Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, wayne, 2005/05/11
- Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/12
- Re: Re: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED, wayne, 2005/05/12
- idnits (was: For SPF council review: NOT RECOMMENDED), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/09
- Re: idnits, wayne, 2005/05/11
- Re: idnits, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/12
- Re: Re: idnits, william(at)elan.net, 2005/05/12
- Re: Re: idnits, wayne, 2005/05/12
- Re: idnits, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/12
- For SPF council review: Definition of PASS, Policy for shared MTAs, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/07
- Let's not lose focus! (and: For SPF council review: Definition of PASS, Policy for shared MTAs), Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/07
- Re: Let's not lose focus! (and: For SPF council review: Definition of PASS, Policy for shared MTAs), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/07
- Re: Let's not lose focus! (and: For SPF council review: Definition of PASS, Policy for shared MTAs), wayne, 2005/05/11
- Re: Let's not lose focus! (and: For SPF council review: Definition of PASS, Policy for shared MTAs), sklist, 2005/05/12
- Re: For SPF council review: Policy for shared MTAs, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/12
- Re: For SPF council review: Policy for shared MTAs, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/12
- Re: For SPF council review: Policy for shared MTAs, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/12
- Re: Let's not lose focus! (and: For SPF council review: Definition of PASS, Policy for shared MTAs), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/12
- Re: For SPF council review: Policy for shared MTAs, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/13
- 2476bis (was: For SPF council review: Policy for shared MTAs), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/14
- Re: NOT RECOMMENDED, wayne, 2005/05/08
- Re: NOT RECOMMENDED, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/07
- Re: NOT RECOMMENDED, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/08
- MAY vs. SHOULD reject different answers (was: NOT RECOMMENDED), Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/08
- Re: MAY vs. SHOULD reject different answers, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/09
- Re: MAY vs. SHOULD reject different answers, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/09
- Re: MAY vs. SHOULD reject different answers, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/09
- RE: NOT RECOMMENDED (was: -01pre5), Mark, 2005/05/07
How useful are per-user policies?,
Radu Hociung,
2005/05/03
- Re: How useful are per-user policies?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/03
- Re: How useful are per-user policies?, Chris Haynes, 2005/05/03
- Re: How useful are per-user policies?, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/04
- Re: How useful are per-user policies?, Philip Gladstone, 2005/05/04
- Re: How useful are per-user policies?, Radu Hociung, 2005/05/04
- Re: How useful are per-user policies?, Philip Gladstone, 2005/05/04
- Re: How useful are per-user policies?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/04
- Re: Re: How useful are per-user policies?, Theo Schlossnagle, 2005/05/04
- Re: How useful are per-user policies?, Ralf Doeblitz, 2005/05/05
The (almost) final SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre5,
wayne,
2005/05/02
- Re: The (almost) final SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre5, David MacQuigg, 2005/05/03
- Re: The (almost) final SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre5, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/05
- Re: The (almost) final SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre5, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/05
- Re: The (almost) final SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre5, wayne, 2005/05/06
- Re: The (almost) final SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre5, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/06
- Re: The (almost) final SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre5, Michael Elliott, 2005/05/09
- Re: The (almost) final SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre5, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/09
- Re: The (almost) final SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre5, Michael Elliott, 2005/05/10
- Re: The (almost) final SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre5, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/11
- Re: The (almost) final SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre5, Julian Mehnle, 2005/05/07
spf with online forms,
Andrew Gutkowski,
2005/05/02
- Re: spf with online forms, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2005/05/02
- Re: spf with online forms, Chris Haynes, 2005/05/02
- RE: spf with online forms, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/02
- Re: spf with online forms, Commerco WebMaster, 2005/05/02
- Re: spf with online forms, Andrew Gutkowski, 2005/05/02
- Re: spf with online forms, Roger B.A. Klorese, 2005/05/02
- Re: spf with online forms, Andrew Gutkowski, 2005/05/02
- Re: spf with online forms, Scott Kitterman, 2005/05/03
Re: For SPF council review: Syntax error = Perm error = Message should be rejected?,
Daniel Taylor,
2005/05/02
- Re: For SPF council review: Syntax error = Perm error = Message should be rejected?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2005/05/02
- Re: For SPF council review: Syntax error = Perm error = Message should be rejected?, Daniel Taylor, 2005/05/02
- Re: For SPF council review: Syntax error = Perm error = Message should be rejected?, Frank Ellermann, 2005/05/02
- Re: For SPF council review: Syntax error = Perm error = Message should be rejected?, wayne, 2005/05/02
- Re: For SPF council review: Syntax error = Perm error = Message should be rejected?, wayne, 2005/05/04
- Re: For SPF council review: Syntax error = Perm error = Message should be rejected?, wayne, 2005/05/05