Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?

wayne wrote:

I still think it is confusing to have example.org having an
SPF record, but when evaluated, it results in "None".


It's not at all confusing, it's plain wrong.  Dangling pointers
are evil.  And it's also net abuse, the receiver _voluntarily_
tried to check SPF and was fed with garbage.  A PermError with
a reject is only the technical minimum.  In practice it should
also result in blacklisting and an abuse report.  Bye, Frank

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, (continued) Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Mark Shewmaker Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Frank Ellermann Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Bill Taroli RE: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Scott Kitterman Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Alex van den Bogaerdt Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Frank Ellermann Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Stuart D. Gathman Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, wayne Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Stuart D. Gathman Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Frank Ellermann <= Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Bill Taroli Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Julian Mehnle Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, wayne draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01pre7 (was: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?), Frank Ellermann Industry Canada recommended best practices, Mark Jeftovic Re: Industry Canada recommended best practices, Mark Jeftovic For SPF council review: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, wayne Re: Re: What to do about redirect= and NXDOMAIN?, Scott Kitterman