In
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)44(_dot_)0505201329180(_dot_)7731-100000(_at_)bmsred(_dot_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
"Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com> writes:
My reading of the spec leads me to believe that when the there is
no SPF record for the target of a redirect or include, the result
should be PermError.
My reading of the spec says that redirect and include act differently
when faced with not finding SPF records. The definition of the
include mechanism contains explicit language to define these case,
while while the redirect modifier does not.
This is at least how I read the spec. Could you please explain more
about why you think they act the same?
-wayne