spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Clarification on "RFC Editor Note"

2005-05-11 05:07:06
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

William Leibzon wrote:
Having read Mr Hardie's response, I believe he may have misunderstanding
regarding concerns of the people involved in SPF Community and has
incorrectly assumed that we're trying to interfere with somebody else's
experiment and trying to prevent it from running.

Actually, we _do_.  We _do_ want to prevent an experiment where plain 
v=spf1 records are used for checking non-HELO/MAILFROM identities.

The important question is if that exact experiment is what certain parties 
want to happen.  I very much doubt that the IESG or just the AD want it, 
but obviously Microsoft's interests are different.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCgfVrwL7PKlBZWjsRAh0UAKD46yIbF1MQC03taqV0M9LgCtewzQCfZEF2
yld8op8o8P0honjMInl+y00=
=oqVU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----