-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman wrote:
Perhaps we just need to believe that what MS is doing is in fact an
"experiment". If it's just a science fair that won't be used in
production, who cares. Perhaps we say "NOT RECOMMENDED for production
use" instead of just "NOT RECOMMENDED". Then if someone checks PRA
against an SPF version 1 record in a production environment, it's very
clear where the fault lies, but no one can complain that we're
preventing their "experiment".
Without wanting to sound clever, _they_ are preventing their experiment.
If I say "I want to do an experiment where all participants may assume red
traffic lights to be yellow ones, and yellow ones to be green ones, oh,
and every communal government that doesn't like this should mount warning
signs to their lights", I shouldn't be surprised if a lot of people see to
it that my experiment never takes off.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCgmzJwL7PKlBZWjsRArffAKDgQU/5quEsQmLaLS6AmgprbFbAMACeORBv
0N4ilhksFH5Suv5ksYx2IJs=
=1lYP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----