wayne wrote:
Not only didn't the MARID folks follow directions
Care to explain what you're talking about ? MARID was closed,
nobody's forced to replace the string "Sender-ID" on the say
so of the former WG Chairs in his later submissions. If it's
that what you meant.
And the first set of I-Ds were all submitted as "experimental":
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=12542>
Meng is making the claim that SPF-classic won't become an RFC
if we have anything like the above paragraph
Meng claims many things starting with "CYA" about one year ago.
Ted promised to sponsor / shepherd "experimental", he did this.
Now we go for "proposed standard", a new chapter in this saga.
Meng even said that MS is "cooperating" with us because they
haven't submitted their own SPF draft to be used instead of
draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.
The part up to and including "because" is dubious, but the rest
is true, although senderid-core-00 cites draft-lentczner. Bye.