wayne wrote:
There are a couple of reasons why I didn't mention it.
Sure, there are a couple of reasons I don't mention it
unless it's yet-another-scope-thread. But a disussion
about add1_scopes= virtually minutes before the battle,
which is essentially a subset of op=, or a discussion
about redefining PermError / None in a way incompatible
with say Sendmail's immplementation or draft-kucherawy -
- seriously, SPF doesn't need enemies, it has friends.
Ordre, contreordre, désordre. Zone cut is bad enough.
your op= draft pulls in a lot of other things that I'm
not sure we want to deal with at this stage of the
standardization of SPF.
I'm almost sure, TINW don't want it before the SPF RfC.
I also don't want a part of it disguised as add1_scope=
unless it's a result of an agreement with the Sender-ID
folks approved by Harry / Jim / Andy on their side and
the SPF Council on our side. Meng voting on both sides.
Bye, Frank