spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Suresh Ramasubramanian on SPF

2005-05-15 18:51:20

This is probably old news to many, but I just stumbled across it.

http://www.circleid.com/article.php?id=1039_0_1_0_C/


Suresh writes:


  And speaking of controversial...

    > If the top 50 domains in the world who are sick of the spam
    problem implemented the non-SPF ban, this would force every other
    domain in the world to comply with SPF - unless they don't care
    for their e-mails. 

   That is going to be far, far more ruinous, if only because SPF is
   badly thought out and fails horribly in several edge cases. Several
   spammers can, and do publish SPF records. And the implication of
   publishing SPF records absolutely forces people to rely only on
   their email provider's mailserver assuming the restrictive - all
   SPF record - more conservative ?all and ~all records are not going
   to be very useful, and -all is guaranteed to lose you mail, given
   the number of forwarding email providers who don't implement the
   other side of the SPF coin - ses/srs return path rewriting of
   forwarded mail.



-wayne


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>