Re: BTFOOM

spf-discuss

Re: BTFOOM

2005-05-22 02:17:40

Julian Mehnle wrote:

 [result]

Yes, I noticed.


Something about your pending 63/64 [Discuss], it's all in
RfC 3696, and Wayne already has a RfC 3696 reference.  You
only need a sentence somewhere pointing again to it.  Bye.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
BTFOOM (was: SPF-council IRC logs for 2005-05-18), Frank Ellermann Re: BTFOOM, wayne Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann <= Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle 63/64 and two minor -01 problems (was: BTFOOM), Frank Ellermann Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, wayne Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, wayne RE: Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, Scott Kitterman Re: Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, wayne Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, Frank Ellermann

Previous by Date:	Re: Re: People keep misunderstanding what "Pass" and "Neutral" mean, Bill Taroli
Next by Date:	Re: PermError and NXDOMAIN in spf-01, Julian Mehnle
Previous by Thread:	Re: Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle
Next by Thread:	Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]