Re: BTFOOM

spf-discuss

Re: BTFOOM

2005-05-22 21:58:51

Julian Mehnle wrote:

what's a "63/64 [Discuss]"?


A "[Discuss]" is the IESG term for something like a "for SPF
Council review" here.  You wanted to discuss three points in
the telechat last week, the first was "sign", I forgot the
the 2nd, and the 3rd was "local part length limit 63" (64).

RfC 3696 explains all details about various length limits.

                      Bye, Frank

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
BTFOOM (was: SPF-council IRC logs for 2005-05-18), Frank Ellermann Re: BTFOOM, wayne Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle Re: BTFOOM, Frank Ellermann <= Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle 63/64 and two minor -01 problems (was: BTFOOM), Frank Ellermann Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, wayne Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, wayne RE: Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, Scott Kitterman Re: Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, wayne Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems, Frank Ellermann exp= modifier and processing limits, wayne RE: BTFOOM, Mark

Previous by Date:	Sep 22 - Jan 03 (was: PermError and NXDOMAIN in spf-01), Frank Ellermann
Next by Date:	Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, Frank Ellermann
Previous by Thread:	Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle
Next by Thread:	Re: BTFOOM, Julian Mehnle
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]