spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: 63/64 and two minor -01 problems

2005-05-24 13:47:58
In <42932C36(_dot_)47AA(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> Frank Ellermann 
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> writes:

wayne wrote:

I didn't like RFC821, since it will be obsoletedby RFC2821
Real Soon Now.

"Real Soon Now" is some grumpy joke, right ?

Yeah, although many other people use it.  "Any Minute Now" is for
things that should happen within a year or so.  ;-)


please remove '"exp" counted' in 10.1 - throwing a PermError
after the result is clear is rubbish)
 
If I recall correctly, this was discussed and people really
wanted exp= to be counted.

Yes, it was discussed, but TTBOMK people agreed that when a
client already has a solid FAIL it makes no sense to "reduce"
this to a PermError only because of one additional exp= query.

Ok, I tried looking into this some, but couldn't find the
discussions.  I am very reluctant to re-open old issues.


Unrelated, out of curiosity, is iesg@ the IESG equivalent to
the spf-council list, is it public ?  Or is it some "JFTR" mail
device for internal purposes ?

My understanding is that the IESG mailing list is kind of the opposite
of the spf-council list.  Anyone can post messages to the IESG, but
only IESG people can read them.  The spf-council list is open to the
public, but non-members have their messages moderated.


-wayne


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>