In <42932C36(_dot_)47AA(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> writes:
wayne wrote:
I didn't like RFC821, since it will be obsoletedby RFC2821
Real Soon Now.
"Real Soon Now" is some grumpy joke, right ?
Yeah, although many other people use it. "Any Minute Now" is for
things that should happen within a year or so. ;-)
please remove '"exp" counted' in 10.1 - throwing a PermError
after the result is clear is rubbish)
If I recall correctly, this was discussed and people really
wanted exp= to be counted.
Yes, it was discussed, but TTBOMK people agreed that when a
client already has a solid FAIL it makes no sense to "reduce"
this to a PermError only because of one additional exp= query.
Ok, I tried looking into this some, but couldn't find the
discussions. I am very reluctant to re-open old issues.
Unrelated, out of curiosity, is iesg@ the IESG equivalent to
the spf-council list, is it public ? Or is it some "JFTR" mail
device for internal purposes ?
My understanding is that the IESG mailing list is kind of the opposite
of the spf-council list. Anyone can post messages to the IESG, but
only IESG people can read them. The spf-council list is open to the
public, but non-members have their messages moderated.
-wayne