Chuck Mead wrote:
I was ROTFLMFAO on that one!
There are several BUTs, like
...but the tracker is nice
...but the Vatican is rather persistent
...but Phil had a worse NomCom idea
...but at least one of two WGs I know works
...but from our POV here's something more serious:
Fresh from the I-D factory:
05-20 01:39 draft-lyon-senderid-pra-01.txt
05-20 01:39 draft-lyon-senderid-core-01.txt
05-20 01:39 draft-katz-submitter-01.txt
05-17 09:46 draft-ietf-dnsext-wcard-clarify-07.txt
05-17 09:46 draft-shafranovich-feedback-report-01.txt
05-14 10:06 draft-fenton-identified-mail-02.txt
05-14 10:01 draft-spf-6-3-options-06.txt
05-07 07:35 draft-hutzler-spamops-04.txt
05-06 12:15 draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-02.txt
05-04 02:01 draft-leibzon-emailredirection-traceheaders-01.txt
05-04 02:00 draft-lilly-field-specification-03.txt
05-03 00:12 draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark-04.txt
draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 now has a proper reference to v=spf1.
But it still says:
SHOULD interpret the version prefix "v=spf1" as equivalent to
"spf2.0/mfrom,pra", provided no record starting with "spf2.0" exists.
Bye, Frank