Mark wrote:
I brought up the matter at the Council meeting before the
last one (in absentia of Meng):
Yes, I've seen it, I read all the IRC logs, three or four
times even "live" on Wayne's Web page.
[00:47] <grumpy> that is a note in the IESG stuff.
That didn't answer the question. Ted's reply is better. It's
quite possible that it was a communication problem between Ted
and Wayne (or "us").
Now Ted made it clear that one experiment MUST NOT interfere
with other experiments. We certainly know what to do on our
side. Now let's see what Sender-ID does on their side. Is it
okay to quote Ted's reply in public elsewhere if necessary ?
I will at least be able to tell you whether it was Meng.
Assuming that it was NOT Meng Ted would have set the standard
for a future senderid-core-01 backwards compatibility chapter.
This is not a witch hunt, this is really important. Tnx & bye.