spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: For SPF council review: Syntax error = Permerror = Message should be rejected?

2005-05-03 15:30:31
Scott Kitterman wrote:

"
[...]
Well make sure your record has correct syntax and doesn't
exceed any processing limits before you publish because if
you get it wrong, your mail will get rejected."

I think that will be a hard sell on spf-help.

Wayne's -00 draft is now the "official" draft for more than
four months.  If some tools like the SPF wizard still have a
serious problem to count to ten, then they are partially
broken.

The fact that it should stay away from proposing ptr is also
not new, I can't guess how often you had to post the same
question in spf-help, "are you sure that you need the ptr ?".

If users with difficulties to count to ten try to publish SPF
policies I can only pray that it's only about their own mail
and domain, and not affecting other users of the same domain.

You think that it could discourage new users.  I was much more
worried about Radu's results with incredibly complex sender
policies, among others Pobox, RR, your policy, and IIRC Terry
also said something about some dummy include-s referencing
non-existing policies as a good idea.  It's not, it's an error.

                           Bye, Frank