-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman wrote:
In this case, I advised that they go complain to godaddy.com to fix
their record, but in the meantime, should all domains that have
include:godaddy.com in their SPF record be rejected?
This is not for the spec to say. It's receiver policy.
If I thought people were rejecting on PermError/Unknown, then I'd have
had to advise him not to publish an SPF record until Godaddy gets
themselves fixed. That isn't going to help adoption.
It is practically impossible to predict how people are going to react to
PermError/Unknown. As for a practical solution to this user's problem, he
could manually include the semantics of the GoDaddy record in his own
record.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCkRQowL7PKlBZWjsRArglAKC7si2miiNJxmVU/1uKNznWXqGfEACgp94K
VEs+kKKA08jQ4C8XFKhHHlo=
=DsDW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----