spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Review of MARID ID: draft-lyon-senderid-core-01

2005-05-25 13:57:00
from [wayne] [Permanent Link] 
In <200505252230(_dot_)53683(_dot_)bulk(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net> Julian Mehnle 
<bulk(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net> writes:



From the address headers of your review, I gather that you did not CC it to 
the IESG, right?  If so, why not?


The spf-discuss mailing list software strips the CC's and such.  It
was indeed forwarded to the IESG.


-wayne
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: For SPF Council review: Section 9.3.1.2 and the 63 chars limit for localpart crypto schemes, wayne
Next by Date:  Re: For SPF Council review: Section 9.3.1.2 and the 63 chars limit for localpart crypto schemes, Julian Mehnle
Previous by Thread:  Re: Review of MARID ID: draft-lyon-senderid-core-01, Julian Mehnle
Next by Thread:  Sending mail from dynamic IP-addresses with dynamic PTR hostnames, but constant EHLO/HELO hostnames, Constantine A. Murenin
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]