Re: -01pre5 (was: -01pre4)

spf-discuss

Re: -01pre5 (was: -01pre4)

2005-05-05 20:18:18

On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:59:03AM +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote:

         And while RfC 2821 declares HELO tv or HELO localhost to be
"malformed" (missing dot) at least host tv is a valid FQDN, and its
potential problems with many receivers have nothing to do with SPF.
It could even have a valid sender policy.


Where does RFC 2821 declare FQDNs like "tv" to be malformed?

Hint: browse for "one or more"

Alex

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: -01pre4, Julian Mehnle Re: -01pre4, Julian Mehnle Re: -01pre4, william(at)elan.net Re: -01pre4, wayne -01pre5 (was: -01pre4), Frank Ellermann Re: -01pre5 (was: -01pre4), Alex van den Bogaerdt <= Re: -01pre5, Julian Mehnle Re: -01pre5, wayne Re: -01pre5, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: -01pre5, wayne s/prefix/sign/ and 20 seconds for foo.slow.sp.am (was: -01pre5), Frank Ellermann Re: -01pre5, Julian Mehnle

Previous by Date:	Re: Outstanding draft issues that I've missed, wayne
Next by Date:	Re: Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results, Alex van den Bogaerdt
Previous by Thread:	-01pre5 (was: -01pre4), Frank Ellermann
Next by Thread:	Re: -01pre5, Julian Mehnle
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]