spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: X-trust-previous-hop:

2005-05-10 05:37:41
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:21:25PM +0200, Julian Mehnle wrote:
spf-related:

It would be convenient for MUA's if there were a header item that said:
"I fully and completely trust the previous MTA."

If there were such a claim, (placed in or above Received), then MUA's
could know they could trust the authentication and other headers one-hop
backwards.

The problem with that is that the ability to make such an assertion ("full 
and complete trust") is rarely useful in real life.


Received: by MUA
Received: from_trusted virusscanner.example.org
        by spamassassin.example.org
        [...]
Received: from_trusted mxhost.example.org
        by virusscanner.example.org
        [...]
Received: from spamhost.spamhouse.invalid
        by mxhost.example.org
        [...]
Received: from_trusted goodguy.example.net
        [...]
Received-SPF: [... resulting in PASS]
X-Spam-Flag: no
[...]

The MUA need not have knowledge about the infrastructure yet it
does know it cannot trust "Received-SPF:"

This proposal could work. The trust chain stops as soon as a
"Received: from " (note last space) is seen.  Ignore any information
after that line.

Alex


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>