-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Wayne Schlitt wrote:
I *think* the IPv6 stuff is all well defined. There *are* people
using it and it has been hashed out. But, since I don't use IPv6, I
don't feel anywhere near as comfortable about declaring it solid.
Maybe Julian or other IPv6 users will chip in with their opinions.
I am using IPv6 for mail, and my SPF records apply to the IPv4 and IPv6
identities of my server equally. Although I am not using any specific
IPv6 features of SPF (such as <ip6-cidr-length>) in my records, as far as
I have reviewed the IPv6 aspects of the SPF specification, I'm pretty sure
it is sound and consistent.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCjo8EwL7PKlBZWjsRAo+8AJ0YXTycFPy+69sxk609jnnt+QCuegCeNaBD
hiCQhQtaR7dmhMun23GWdPQ=
=N5Vm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----