Re: IPv6 / a+ip6

wayne wrote:

> I *think* the IPv6 stuff is all well defined.
+1

Not that I know anything about IPv6, but I continued to ask
here until I got the idea of dual-cidr-length, and the example
was fixed to use RfC 3849.  There's IMHO no parsing problem:

"directive" is separated by 1*SP, name has no ":", therefore
"directive" vs. "modifier" is always clear.  The names of the
mechanisms contain no ":", it's also no "prefix". therefore
"ip4:", "ip6:", etc. are fine.

                         Bye, Frank