In
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)62(_dot_)0505282322410(_dot_)15027(_at_)sokol(_dot_)elan(_dot_)net>
"william(at)elan.net" <william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net> writes:
The following are the changes I've noticed in IETF datatracker for some
of SPF and related drafts:
2. draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt
Date Version Comment
2005-05-26 01 [hardie] [IN IESG DISCUSSION] Further discussion on the
intended status and relationship to MARID working group needed.
2005-05-26 01 [hardie] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted
Hardie has been changed to Discuss from Yes by Ted Hardie
2005-05-26 01 [becarpenter] [IN IESG DISCUSSION] I have followed
Harald's lead = no objection
2005-05-26 01 [becarpenter] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No
Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2005-05-23 01 [rhousley] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ
Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
Note: 7 votes of no objection by IESG right now (need 9 to pass by IESG),
would have been 8 if Ted Hardie had not changed his vote on 05-26
There is also one outstanding "discuss" that relates to the issue of
zone cuts. Since zone cuts have been removed, this discuss will
probably change, but what it will change to is anyone's guess.
I, personally, don't find Ted's change surprising since I *did* ask
him to consider the draft for standard track.
3. draft-katz-submitter (Experimental)
draft-lyon-senderid-core (Experimental)
draft-lyon-senderid-pra (Experimental)
(they are listed as one group in IETF datatracker)
Note: The IETF datatracker informs me that the last change was on
05-27, but I can not find any notes on that day in the datatracker.
Yeah, I noticed that also. I have no idea what it means, but then,
I'm pretty ignorant about such details.
-wayne