spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IETF Datatracker Records

2005-05-29 06:37:39

Correction. It appears I got confused at IETF tracker about IESG votes
and counted votes for those who are no longer at IESG (i.e. Harald).
So it is currently 6/9 votes for SPF and 4/9 for SID drafts.

On Sat, 28 May 2005, william(at)elan.net wrote:

The following are the changes I've noticed in IETF datatracker for some
of SPF and related drafts:

1. draft-lentczner-spf-00.txt
2005-05-26: State Changes to Dead from AD is watching by IESG Secretary

2. draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt
Date Version Comment
2005-05-26 01 [hardie] [IN IESG DISCUSSION] Further discussion on the intended status and relationship to MARID working group needed. 2005-05-26 01 [hardie] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to Discuss from Yes by Ted Hardie 2005-05-26 01 [becarpenter] [IN IESG DISCUSSION] I have followed Harald's lead = no objection 2005-05-26 01 [becarpenter] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter 2005-05-23 01 [rhousley] [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley

Note: 7 votes of no objection by IESG right now (need 9 to pass by IESG),
     would have been 8 if Ted Hardie had not changed his vote on 05-26

3. draft-katz-submitter (Experimental)
  draft-lyon-senderid-core (Experimental)
  draft-lyon-senderid-pra (Experimental)
  (they are listed as one group in IETF datatracker)

Note: The IETF datatracker informs me that the last change was on 05-27, but I can not find any notes on that day in the datatracker.

2005-05-25 01 [hartmans] [IN IESG DISCUSSION] I cannot support publication of this ballot because I believe that the conflicting use of the spf1 records between this proposal and the SPF proposal is harmful to the Internet. Particularly given that there was marid wg consensus on this point I'm unwilling to block publication over this issue although I understand others may. 2005-05-20 01 [becarpenter] [IN IESG DISCUSSION] I have followed Harald's lead = no objection 2005-05-20 01 [becarpenter] [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter

Note: 4 votes of no objection plus one yes vote (by Ted Hardie)
     right now (so 5/9).


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>