spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: Confusion about draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01 (SPF-Classic)

2005-05-23 06:33:25
In <20050523120937(_dot_)GA3526(_at_)nic(_dot_)fr> Stephane Bortzmeyer 
<bortzmeyer(_at_)nic(_dot_)fr> writes:

On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 07:46:48PM -0500,
 wayne <wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net> wrote 
 a message of 170 lines which said:

As such, I would like to ask that the IESG consider this I-D for
Proposed Standard status.  I

You switch from one extreme to the other. Why not Informational
status?


I'm sorry, but which extremes am I switching between?

As far as why not Informational, I agree with William's answer.


-wayne