In <20050523120937(_dot_)GA3526(_at_)nic(_dot_)fr> Stephane Bortzmeyer
<bortzmeyer(_at_)nic(_dot_)fr> writes:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 07:46:48PM -0500,
wayne <wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net> wrote
a message of 170 lines which said:
As such, I would like to ask that the IESG consider this I-D for
Proposed Standard status. I
You switch from one extreme to the other. Why not Informational
status?
I'm sorry, but which extremes am I switching between?
As far as why not Informational, I agree with William's answer.
-wayne