spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: overall HELO FAIL

2005-05-28 00:02:10
--On Freitag, Mai 27, 2005 16:20:57 -0700 Dennis Willson <taz(_at_)taz-mania(_dot_)com> wrote:

Yes I totally agree.... As far as I'm concerned if a domain has SPF
records defined then a mail server either has permission to send email
for that domain or it doesn't. So if the SPF records exist then there is
PASS and FAIL. I really don't get why someone would use "~all" or "?all".

Maybe because SPF allows you to distinguish between different localparts? In most cases I can giv you a definite PASS or FAIL, but for some localparts this is not possible, so I will return a indeterminate result.

If you're going to do that, just don't use SPF.

Another reason to just use "v=spf1" (which results in NEUTRAL): DNS caching. A positive result (even just stating effectively "no SPF here") is usually cached much longer than a negative result (I use 6h vs. 30 min).

Ralf Döblitz


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>