Re: PermError and NXDOMAIN in spf-01

Julian Mehnle wrote:

> Wayne Schlitt wrote:
>  
>
> > I think that treating NXDOMAIN as None is the most logical thing.  If
> > i-hate-spf.com doesn't want anything to do with SPF, then an SPF check
> > against nxdomain.i-hate-spf.com should return None, not PermError.
> >    
> I don't see the point of your argument.  Receivers aren't supposed to 
> subject obviously invalid identities to SPF checks.  If they want, they 
> can very well accept mail from nxdomain.i-hate-spf.com, but they should 
> not subject it to SPF.
>  
From another thread, I believe the only case where talking about 
NXDOMAIN in relation to SPF makes sense is when it occurs as a result of 
include= or redirect=, and that has (I believe) already been flushed out 
in another thread.
Bill