Julian Mehnle wrote:
I hereby request that the council decide on this issue.
I support to dismiss it, the 63 limit is mentioned in the
draft, and it's possible to create "something like SRS"
respecting this limit with a "last use" driven database
of hashes for longer local parts.
This was discussed here last year. Hannah explained why
that would be a PITA for the biggest hoster of the world,
but it can be still good enough for others. SRS details
should not be mentioned in an SPF draft.
Bye, Frank