Re: HELO versus MAILFROM results

Rene Barbier wrote:
> Radu Hociung wrote:
>
>
> > That's fine... however, if your spec if incompatible with other RFCs,
> > especially mainstream RFCs such the 2821, I think it will be hard to get
> > it passed as an RFC.
>
> You can't make everyone comply with the requirement of a FQDN HELO name,
> but I fail to see why you couldn't force such a requirement on domains
> that publish SPF.
>
> Best regards,
Great question... I think you can force publishers to make their SMTP
servers put out FQDNs, but you'd have to require it in the SPF
specification, not just hope for it.

Regards,
Radu.

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper!  http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature