Leonard Mills wrote:
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Radu Hociung wrote:
how likely is any domain to want a %{l} in their policies
after they've considered all the implications?
With a working abuse desk it's "only" a support nightmare.
You won't find it for free accounts, it's a premium service.
Or a business domain, for that matter, preparing for
-all deployment and using %{l} as part of a policy to
track down the less-informed users (like those sending
through their home ISP, ignoring notifications to use
web mail or the MSP) to gently bring them into the fold.
Excellent short-term use.
This would be a transitionary use of %{l}, but no plans to use it long term?
Regards,
Radu
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature